Families' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.